Judicial Considerations in the Rejection of Conservatoir Beslag in Land Disputes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56087/8xmzbs80Keywords:
land dispute, judicial considerations, conservatoir beslag, legal protectionAbstract
Abstract: This study examines the urgency of legal protection in resolving land disputes by analyzing judicial considerations and the fulfillment of requirements for the issuance of conservatoir beslag in a court judgment at the appellate level. Land disputes constitute a significant issue as they relate to the certainty of rights, the potential for prolonged conflict, and the vulnerability of communities to document misuse or unlawful possession. The central problems addressed in this research are how judges consider and determine rulings in land dispute cases and whether the requirements for conservatoir beslag have been fulfilled in the case under review. The study employs a normative legal approach to examine relevant legal materials and identify the structure of judicial reasoning. The analysis shows that the judge’s decision is grounded in the principles of justice, legal certainty, and the protection of lawful land rights by assessing valid ownership evidence, the legal standing of the parties, and the relevance of prior decisions that confirm unlawful acts committed by the defendant. The issuance of conservatoir beslag is considered to have met its foundational requirements, supported by sufficient preliminary evidence, a clearly identified disputed object, and reasonable concern over potential transfer of the object that could disadvantage the rightful party. The findings highlight the pivotal role of judges in maintaining the status quo of disputed objects to prevent further harm and strengthen legal protection for legitimate owners. This study recommends enhancing public legal education and strengthening inter-institutional coordination to support the effectiveness of preventive measures in land dispute cases.
References
[1] R. K. Ningsih, H. Tuasikal, and U. M. Sorong, “Tantangan dan Solusi dalam Implementasi Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Challenges and Solutions in the Implementation of Mediation as an Alternative for Land Dispute Resolution,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 70–89, 2025, doi: 10.58824/jdls.v2i1.323.
[2] P. Timbulnya, S. Ganda, and A. Tanah, “TINDAKAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL DALAM MENERAPKAN ASAS MUTAKHIR UNTUK MENGURANGI POTENSI TIMBULNYA SERTIFIKAT GANDA ATAS TANAH,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020.
[3] S. Penerbitan and S. Tanah, “ANALISIS PUTUSAN PTUN MEDAN MENGENAI KEWENANGAN BPN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PENERBITAN SERTIFIKAT TANAH,” vol. 16, no. 1, 2025.
[4] S. Afdilla, “LEGAL REASONING HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN WANPRESTASI AKAD MURABAHAH DENGAN OBJEK JAMINAN TANAH STATUS UWTO,” 2025.
[5] J. Hukum, “ANALISIS IMPLIKASI EKSEKUSI PENGANGKATAN SITA JAMINAN ( CONSERVATOIR BESLAG ) TERHADAP TANAH DAN BANGUNAN,” vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 432–447, 2025.
[6] A. Rosidi, M. Zainuddin, and I. Arifiana, “Metode Dalam Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Sosiologis (Field Research),” J. Law Gov., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 46–58, 2024.
[7] M. R. S. P, A. S. Istisofania, E. Z. Simbolon, and P. D. Julydya, “Analisis Tentang Kewenangan Hakim Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata,” vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 354–368, 2025.
[8] I. J. of L. and E. Review, “Analisis Keabsahan Bukti Elektronik dalam Pemeriksaan Persidangan Perkara Pidana dan Implementasi Admisibilitasnya (Studi Putusan),” vol. 20, no. 4, 2025, doi: 10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1395.
[9] Z. S. Hakanadila and A. Salam, “Lex Patrimonium Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penerapan Pasal 1365 dan Pasal 1372 Kuhperdata Secara Kumulatif Terhadap Gugatan Ganti Rugi Dalam Kasus Pencemaran Nama Baik,” vol. 4, no. 3, 2025.
[10] P. Studi and P. Nomor, “Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis. Vol.6. No.6 (2025) Tema/Edisi : Hukum Keluarga (Bulan Keenam) https://jhlg.rewangrencang.com/,” vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1–24, 2025.
[11] E. I. Luntungan, H. Pondaag, and S. D. L. Roeroe, “Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025): Lex Privatum-Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Unsrat,” vol. 16, no. 1, 2025.
[12] U. Dani, Y. Terpencar, A. Publik, and D. A. N. Privat, “Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan PERTANAHAN YANG TERPENCAR ANTARA PUBLIK DAN PRIVAT,” vol. 55, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.21143/jhp.vol55.no.2.1819.
[13] V. No, A. Juni, and G. Permata, “Tinjauan Yuridis Sita Jaminan Hak Milik Pihak Ketiga ( Studi Kasus No . 28 / PDT / 2018 / PT BGL ),” vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 272–279, 2025.
[14] F. Hukum and U. H. Nommensen, Diajukan Untuk Memenuhi Salah Satu Syarat Memperoleh Gelar Sarjana Hukum pada Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas HKBP Nommensen. 2025.
[15] F. Nugroho, N. A. Sinaga, F. O. Law, and D. Marsekal, “VERSTEK DALAM HUKUM ACARA PERDATA kewajibannya . Negara memberikan kesempatan bagi warga negara untuk menuntut haknya hakim sendiri , melainkan harus mengikuti prosedur hukum yang berlaku . Salah satu cara,” vol. 3, pp. 188–203, 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Moh Rafli Darussalam, Dwi Handayani, Sri Amlinawaty A.Muin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
