Pertanggungjawaban Notaris terhadap Isi Akta Autentik yang Tidak Sesuai dengan Fakta
Abstract
In making an authentic deed, the Notary must guarantee certainty, order, and legal protection based on Law Number 2 of 2014. This research aims to determine the indicators so that the Notary can be held accountable for the contents of the Authentic Deed he made and explain the form of accountability that can be imposed on Notary regarding the contents of the Authentic Deed, which are inconsistent with the facts. The type of research used in this research is normative research and is supported by interview data. This study uses a statutory approach, a case approach, and a comparative approach. This study uses secondary data sources consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The method of analysis in this study is to use qualitative analysis. The results show that the indicator so that the Notary can be held accountable for the contents of the Authentic Deed he makes is the intention or negligence of the Notary in making the authentic deed. Furthermore, the forms of accountability that can be passed on to the Notary for the contents of the Authentic Deed that are not following the facts, among others, are Civil, Criminal, and Administrative Liability/Code of Ethics. Based on these conclusions, it is recommended that notaries make authentic deeds based on morals, ethics and prudence, thoroughness, objectivity, and good faith to comply with all applicable legal provisions. Besides, it is necessary to renew the Law related to the cumulation or incorporation of the application of sanctions as a form of accountability for a notary public because the regulation of the cumulation or merger of the application of these sanctions will undoubtedly provide more protection and legal certainty for the injured parties, including the Notary itself.
References
Adjie, H. (2009). Sekilas Dunia Notaris & PPAT Indonesia: Kumpulan Tulisan. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.
Adjie, H. (2010). Hukum Notaris Indonesia: Tafsir Tematik terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Afifah, K. (2017). Tanggung Jawab dan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Notaris secara Perdata terhadap Akta yang Dibuatnya. Lex Renaissance, 2(1), 147-161. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol2.iss1.art10
Arisaputra, M. I. (2012). Kewajiban Notaris dalam Menjaga Kerahasiaan Akta dalam Kaitannya dengan Hak Ingkar Notaris. Perspektif: Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan, 17(3), 173-183. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v17i3.106
Asshiddiqie, J. & Safa'at, M. A. (2006). Teori Hans Kelsen tentang Hukum. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Begem, S. S., et al. (2019). Sistem Hukum Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Berat Melalui Mahkamah Pidana Internasional. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 1-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i1.28
Budify, A., et al. (2020). Pembatalan Akta Hibah di Pengadilan Negeri Pematangsiantar: Kajian Putusan Nomor 33/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Pms. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 72-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i1.77
Colonial Regulations, Staatsblad Number 23 of 1847 on the Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie/the Civil Code.
Extraordinary Congress of the Indonesian Notary Association of 2015 on Amendment to Code of Ethics for the Notary Public.
Hably, R. U. & Djajaputra, G. (2019). Kewenangan Notaris dalam Hal Membuat Akta Partij (Contoh Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 1003 K/Pid/2015). Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 2(2), 1-26. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v2i2.6562
Hammerfest, O. (2018). "Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris atas Pemalsuan Akta Autentik". Dissertation. Universitas Jember.
Harefa, N. S. K., et al. (2020). Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Dilakukan oleh Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PNS): Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor: 73/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Mdn. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 30-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i1.68
Hariyadi, H. (2020). Restrukturisasi Utang sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Kepailitan pada Perseroan Terbatas. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(2), 119-135. doi: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i2.61
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 on Criminal Code Regulations.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1960 on Amendment of the Criminal Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1960 Number 1, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1921).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30 of 2004 on the Office of Notary Public (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 117, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4432).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2014 on the Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2004 on the Office of Notary Public (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 3, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5491).
M., I. G. N. W. H. (2016). "Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Akta Otentik yang Turut Serta Dilakukan oleh Notaris". Thesis. Universitas Narotama Surabaya.
Mamminanga, A. (2008). "Pelaksanaan Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Notaris Daerah dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Jabatan Notaris berdasarkan UUJN". Bachelor Thesis. Universitas Gajah Mada.
Marzuki, M. A. (2018). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Atas Kesalahan Ketik pada Minuta Akta yang Sudah Keluar Salinan Akta. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 4(2), 128-138. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v4i2.15463
Mido, M. T. C., et al. (2018). Tanggung Jawab Perdata Notaris terhadap Akta yang Dibacakan oleh Staf Notaris di Hadapan Penghadap. Lentera Hukum, 5(1), 156-173. doi: https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v5i1.6288
Miru, A. (2010). Hukum Kontrak & Perancangan Kontrak. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Momuat, O. M. (2014). Alat Bukti Tulisan dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan. Lex Privatum, 2(1), 134-143.
Notodisuryo, S. R. (2000). Hukum Notariat di Indonesia: Suatu Penjelasan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Prahardika, R. B. & Kawuryan, E. S. (2018). Tanggung Gugat Notaris atas Kelalaian dalam Membuat Akta Perjanjian Kredit Bank. Jurnal Transparansi Hukum, 1(1), 37-54. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30737/transparansi.v1i1.172
Regulation of Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 61 of 2016 on Procedure for Imposing Administrative Sanction against Notary (Bulletin Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2016 Number 2128).
Sofyan, A. & Azisa, N. (2016). Hukum Pidana. Makassar: Pustaka Pena Press.
Subekti, R. (2008). Hukum Perjanjian (Revision Edition). Jakarta: PT. Intermasa.
Suhyana, F. A., et al. (2021). Transaksi Ilegal Menggunakan Kartu ATM Milik Orang Lain. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 138-156. doi: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i2.92
Syahrani, R. (2004). Seluk Beluk dan Asas-Asas Hukum Perdata. Bandung: PT. Alumni.
Widiasih, N. K. A. E. & Sarjana, I. M. (2017). Risalah Lelang sebagai Akta Otentik Pengganti Akta Jual Beli dalam Lelang. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 1-6.
Yuni, N. (2020). Marine Pollution Ditinjau dari Perbandingan Praktik Negara terhadap Instrumen Hukum Internasional. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 55-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i1.63
Copyright (c) 2021 Rizky Amalia, Musakkir Musakkir, Syamsuddin Muchtar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
