The Effectiveness of Legal Protection for the Victims of Violence Due to the Criminal of Mishandling
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effectiveness of legal protection for the victims of violence due to the criminal of mishandling in Bone Regency and the factors that influence it. In this study the researcher uses normative and empirical research which is descriptive and prescriptive. The process of collecting data in this study were through by interview, documentation, and also literature study. The analysis method is carried out by systematically identifying and connecting the primary data with the primary legal materials. The result of this study indicates that legal protection for the victim of violence due to criminal of mishandling in Bone Regency is still running less effective. In this point, mishandling case is tend to increase every day. In other hand there are still several cases that have not been completely resolved, which is by the police considered as lack of solid evidences. Likewise, there are still mishandling cases in the court that have not been resolved because they are still in process. In addition, the fulfillment of victims’ rights has not been fully implemented, such as the right to receive spiritual guidance services. So, even though the implementation of government’s obligation and law enforcement has been effective, it still needs to be improved in order to achieve the effectiveness of legal protection for the victims of mishandling criminal under the jurisdiction of Bone subregional police. The factors that influenced the effectiveness of legal protection for the victims of mishandling criminal in Bone Regency, namely the legal substance factor, legal structure factor, legal culture factor, facilities and infrastructure factor, legal knowledge factor, and legal awareness factor. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the professionalism of law enforcement towards officers, and fulfil the rights of the victims. In addition, the government and law enforcement must be maximized the providing of legal protection, especially by considering the factors that affect the effectiveness, so that legal protection can be optimally realized in the future.
References
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Agus, P. A. (2017). Kedudukan Sertifikasi Halal dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Hukum Islam. Amwaluna: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah, 1(1), 149-165. doi: https://doi.org/10.29313/amwaluna.v1i1.2172
Ahmad, I. (2018). Rencana dan Strategi Peningkatan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat. Gorontalo Law Review, 1(1), 15-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v1i1.94
Akbar, I. (2016). Demokrasi dan Gerakan Sosial (Bagaimana Gerakan Mahasiswa terhadap Dinamika Perubahan Sosial). Jurnal Wacana Politik, 1(1), 107-115. doi: https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v1i2.11052
Budify, A., et al. (2020). Pembatalan Akta Hibah di Pengadilan Negeri Pematangsiantar: Kajian Putusan Nomor 33/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Pms. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 72-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i1.77
Ekawati, E. (2016). Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) sebagai Civil Society di Indonesia. Nuansa: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Keagamaan Islam, 13(2), 233-250.
Erlina, E. (2014). Analisa Kriminologi Terhadap Kekerasan dalam Kejahatan. Al Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan, 3(2), 217-228.
Fahmi, I. (2013). Peranan Slogan Anti Korupsi terhadap Pencegahan Korupsi (Studi Kasus Kantor BPN Kota Medan). Perspektif, 2(1), 22-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v2i1.104
Guna, R. A. & Martana, N. A. (2015). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Kasus Pieter Rumaropen Terkait Pertanggungjawaban Atlet dalam Cabang Olahraga Sepak Bola. Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 1-5.
Haq, I. (2017). Jarimah terhadap Kehormatan Simbol Simbol Negara (Persfektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Hukum Pidana Islam). Diktum: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, 15(1), 11-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v15i1.422
Harahap, F. R. (2013). Dampak Urbanisasi bagi Perkembangan Kota di Indonesia. Society, 1(1), 35-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v1i1.40
Irsan, K. (2015). Polisi, Kekerasan dan Senjata Api: Tantangan Pemolisian di Era Demokrasi. Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, 1(5), 297-310. doi: https://doi.org/10.31599/jkn.v1i2.27
Jamun, Y. M. (2018). Dampak Teknologi terhadap Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Missio, 10(1), 48-52.
Kaawoan, G. K. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Terdakwa dan Terpidana sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Lex Administratum, 5(1), 125-131.
Karya, D. (2013). Tindak Pidana Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga yang Dilakukan Suami terhadap Istri. DIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(17), 35-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v9i17.248
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 on Criminal Code Regulations.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1960 on Amendment of the Criminal Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1960 Number 1, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1921).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1981 on the Code of Criminal Procedure (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1981 Number 76, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3209).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 39 of 1999 on Human Rights (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1999 Number 165, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3886).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2002 on the State Police of the Republic of Indonesia (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2002 Number 2, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4168).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 16 of 2004 on the Attorney General’s Office of the Republic of Indonesia (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2004 Number 67, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4401).
Lenti, G. M., et al. (2018). Kejahatan terhadap Tubuh dalam Bentuk Penganiayaan Menurut Pasal 351 Ayat 1-5 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Lex Crimen: Jurnal Elektronik Bagian Hukum Pidana, 7(4), 55-62.
Muzdalifa, I., et al. (2018). Peran Fintech dalam Meningkatkan Keuangan Inklusif pada UMKM di Indonesia (Pendekatan Keuangan Syariah). Jurnal Masharif al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah, 3(1), 1-24. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30651/jms.v3i1.1618
Negara, P. D. (2018). Budaya Malu pada Masyarakat Tengger dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Budaya Hukum Penghindaran Konflik. Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum, 1(2), 141-152. doi: https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v1i2.743
Rahman, S., et al. (2020). Efektivitas Pembagian Harta Bersama Pasca Perceraian: Studi Kasus Perkawinan Poligami. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(2), 104-118. doi: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i2.60
Rosana, E. (2014). Kepatuhan Hukum sebagai Wujud Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat. Jurnal Tapis: Jurnal Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam, 10(1), 1-25.
Sandi, S. (2019). Penegakan Hukum terhadap Kekerasan Penganiayaan Mengakibatkan Matinya Orang: Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Sungguminasa. Al Hikam, 6(1), 131-148.
Santoso, L. & Arifin, B. (2016). Perlindungan Perempuan Korban Kekerasan Perspektif Hukum Islam. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syar'iah, 8(2), 113-125. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v8i2.3732
Sari, P. P. & Basit, L. (2018). Komunikasi Organisasi Kepala Desa dalam Membangun Kesadaran Masyarakat Desa terhadap Pembangunan Desa. Jurnal Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(1), 47-60.
Sayful, M. (2020). Strategi Penghidupan Nelayan Pedagang di Tempat Pelelangan Ikan (Lelong). SIGn Journal of Social Science, 1(1), 1-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjss.v1i1.95
Sulaiman, E. (2016). Problematika Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Ash-Shahabah, 2(1), 64-78.
Syah, S. A., et al. (2020). Efektivitas Fungsi Polri dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan terhadap Anak: Studi di Kepolisian Resort Kota Makassar. Al Hikam, 7(1), 56-69.
Syarifin, P. (2008). Immanuel Kant dalam Buku Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia.
Usman, A. H. (2014). Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat dan Pemerintah sebagai Faktor Tegaknya Negara Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 30(1), 26-53.
Yustia, R. D. A., et al. (2015). Mendobrak Kelemahan Litigasi Konvensional Melalui Model Advokasi Mandiri dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Proses Peradilan. Jurnal Litigasi, 16(1), 2658-2740. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v16i1.51
Copyright (c) 2021 Bunyamin Bunyamin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
