The Role of Additional Proof: A Case Study on Eradication of the Criminal Act of Corruption
Abstract
This research aims to examine and analyze the additional proof role and the factors that influence it in eradicating the criminal act of corruption. This research uses empirical legal research methods. The primary data collection was carried out using a questionnaire, while the secondary data was collected using literature study techniques. The data obtained in this research is then quantified using a quantitative descriptive analysis model, then described using a frequency distribution table for answer research purposes. The results show that additional proof has a very large role in eradicating the criminal act of corruption. In this case, the scope of proof regulated in Law No. 8 of 1981 is still limited, while Article 26A of Law No. 20 of 2001 is quite broad. Furthermore, the factors of legal substance, legal structure, and legal culture also significantly affect the use of additional proof in eradicating the criminal act of corruption. Therefore, it is recommended that the House of Representatives amend Law No. 8 of 1981 regarding the additional proof. Furthermore, it is recommended that law enforcers pay attention to the details of the additional proof regulated in Article 26A of Law No. 20 of 2001 to maximize the eradication of the criminal act of corruption in Indonesia.
References
Basri, H. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana berdasarkan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 104-121. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i2.90
Friedman, L. M. (1984). American Law: An Introduction. W. W. Norton & Company.
Government Regulation in Lieu of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 24 of 1960 on Investigation, Prosecution, and Examination of the Criminal Act of Corruption (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1960 Number 72, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2011).
Harefa, N. S. K., Manik, G. K., Marpaung, I. K. Y., & Batubara, S. A. (2020). Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Dilakukan oleh Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PNS): Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor: 73/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Mdn. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i1.68
Husen, L. O., Salle, S., Syalman, A. A., & Muzakkir, A. K. (2020). Pengamanan Intelijen Kepolisian Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Atas Objek Sengketa. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(2), 136-148. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i2.62
Irwansyah. (2021). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel (Revision Edition). Mirra Buana Media.
Kartika, P. P. (2019). Data Elektronik sebagai Alat Bukti yang Sah dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law, 1(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.31960/ijocl.v1i1.146
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 1971 on Eradication of the Criminal Act of Corruption (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1971 Number 19, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2958).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1981 on the Code of Criminal Procedure (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1981 Number 76, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3209).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 on Eradication of the Criminal Act of Corruption (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1999 Number 140, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3874).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2001 on Amendment to Law Number 31 of 1999 on Eradication of the Criminal Act of Corruption (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2001 Number 134, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4150).
Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).
Rahman, S., Qamar, N., & Kamran, M. (2020). Efektivitas Pembagian Harta Bersama Pasca Perceraian: Studi Kasus Perkawinan Poligami. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(2), 104-118. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i2.60
Rini, N. S. (2018). Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan Administrasi dalam Undang Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum de Jure, 18(2), 257-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.V18.257-274
Risal, M. C. (2018). Penerapan Beban Pembuktian Terbalik dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, 5(1), 74-86. https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v5i2.5401
Rivanie, S. S., Soewondo, S. S., Azisa, N., Abadi, M. T., & Iskandar, I. (2022). The Application of Imprisonment to Kleptomaniacs: A Case Studies of Court Decision. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i1.169
Riyaadhotunnisa, S., Amirulloh, M., & Yuanitasari, D. (2022). Activities of Uncertified Crypto Asset Physical Traders: A Study of Legal Protection for Investor. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 160-172. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.211
Rompegading, A. M. (2022). Deterrence and Eradication of Gratification Crime. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 3(2), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v3i2.161
Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.
Soekanto, S. (2013). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Wyatt, T., Johnson, K., Hunter, L., George, R., & Gunter, R. (2017). Corruption and Wildlife Trafficking: Three Case Studies Involving Asia. Asian Journal of Criminology, 13(1), 35-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-017-9255-8
Copyright (c) 2022 Muh. Nasir, Bambang Nurdiantoro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
