Justice Collaborator In Disclosure Action Criminal Corruption
Abstrak
This study aims to determine and analyze the strength of the evidence of justice collaborators in disclosing corruption, and to determine the role of Justice Collaborators in disclosing Corruption. This study uses a normative research method using a library approach as the main source, such as library research. Descriptive data analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate the strength of evidence by Justice Collaborators as witnesses in corruption in disclosing corruption cases requires witnesses and evidence, effective case resolution indicates the seriousness of law enforcement officers in working together to uncover corruption. The important role of justice collaborators in uncovering corruption crimes is to provide crucial information and assist law enforcement officers in identifying perpetrators, as well as facilitating investigators and public prosecutors in finding facts in criminal cases in helping to uncover and ease the evidence process. The recommendation in this study is to provide awards or incentives for justice collaborators in providing significant information in uncovering corruption cases. Meanwhile, the regulation of justice collaborators is not clearly regulated in the regulations so that in making ideas regarding the regulation of protection for justice collaborators regarding prevention or disclosure of corruption crimes in the future, as well as related to how to impose sentences, clarity of requirements in the form of procedures and security for a justice collaborator.
Referensi
J. Asshiddiqie, “Gagasan negara hukum indonesia,” 2002.
S. Anggraeni, P. Asba, and M. A. A. Putra, “Kajian Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Saksi Pelaku yang Bekerjasama Dalam Undang-Undang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban,” JULIA J. Litigasi Amsir, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 292–304, 2023.
H. Faizin, “Sejarah Dan Karakteristik Al-Qur’an Dan Terjemahnya Kementerian Agama Ri,” Suhuf, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 283–311, 2021, doi: 10.22548/shf.v14i2.669.
E. Zahara Lubis, “Jurnal Administrasi Publik Dampak Melawan Hukum Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Impact Against the Law in Corruption,” Jap, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 107–116, 2017.
John Kenedi, Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Penal Policy) dalam Sistem Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. 2017.
Suparyanto dan Rosad (2015, “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP SAKSI PELAKU YANG BEKERJASAMA DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Jacob,” Suparyanto dan Rosad (2015, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 248–253, 2020.
P. Hikmawati, “Upaya Perlindungan Whistleblower dan Justice Collabolator dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Negara Huk. Membangun Huk. untuk Keadilan dan Kesejaht., vol. 4, pp. 87–104, 2013.
M. F. Ramadhan, “Legal Review of Action Criminal Exploitation of Street Children at Crossroads in the Name of Beggars,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2025.
F. Laia, “Analisis Yuridis terhadap Perlindungan Hukum bagi Saksi Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia,” J. Panah Keadilan, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 24–39, 2022.
A. Jayadi, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi,” El-Iqthisadi J. Huk. Ekon. Syariah Fak. Syariah dan Huk., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 130, 2020, doi: 10.24252/el-iqthisadi.v2i1.14236.
N. Qamar et al., “Metode Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research Methods),” no. December, p. 176, 2017.
F. S. R. Nurul Qamar, Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal, vol. 11, no. 1. 2020.
A. Badjuri, “Peranan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) sebagai lembaga anti korupsi di indonesia,” J. Bisnis dan Ekon. (JBE), vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 84–96, 2011.
P. D. Bambang Arjuno, Masruchin Ruba’i, “BENTUK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAPOR TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI ( WHISTLEBLOWER ) DAN SAKSI PELAKU YANG BEKERJASAMA ( JUSTICE COLLABORATOR ) DI INDONESIA Bambang Arjuno Masruchin Ruba ’ i Prija Djatmika,” J. Selat, vol. 4, no. 2, 2017.
R. Nezha, “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI JUSTICE COLLABORATOR DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI MENURUT UU PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI DAN KORBAN,” vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–203, 2014.
V. C. Putra, H. Firmansyah, F. Hukum, U. Tarumanagara, F. Hukum, and U. Tarumanagara, “Keringanan Hukuman Bagi Saksi Yang Bekerjasama ( Justice Collaborator ) Dalam Kasus Pembunuhan,” J. Unes Law Rev., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 2963–2973, 2023.
H. J. Pandiangan, “Perbedaan Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perspektif Hukum Acara Pidana Dan Perdata,” To-Ra, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 565, 2017, doi: 10.33541/tora.v3i2.1154.
Nuzul Fajrin and M. Fauzi Ramadhan, “Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Atas Dasar Membela Diri,” Qawanin J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 48–59, 2024, doi: 10.56087/qawaninjih.v4i1.390.
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-sa4.footer##
