Penyelesaian Perkara Lalu Lintas Berbasis Elektronik dalam Upaya Mengurangi Penumpukan Perkara dan Pungutan Liar
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the implementation of electronic-based traffic case resolution in the regions to determine the obstacles in solving electronic-based traffic cases. This type of research uses empirical research. The type of research used in this research is empirical research. Implementation of electronic-based traffic case settlement in the regions, where the offender receives a ticket ID via SMS, then makes a transfer via a bank account. After that, bring proof of e-ticket payment to the district attorney to exchange the confiscated evidence, then the offender gets a ticket ID via SMS, the offender goes to the district court to attend the trial and pay there and the offender receives the ticket ID via SMS. Offenders come to the court to see the announcement of the traffic court and the court directs to pay at the prosecutor's office and the obstacles to solving electronic-based traffic cases, namely legal factors, social factors and community factors. In the implementation of the settlement of traffic cases in the future, this should be stated in the law so that its application can still be clearer, then more in-depth socialization is also needed regarding the prosecution process so that the public will be able to understand.
References
Administrator. (2013, 20 April). Banyak Calo, Sidang Tilang Perlu Dievaluasi. Retrieved from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-2225696/banyak-calo-sidang-tilang-perlu-dievaluasi-, at the date of 26 July 2020.
Apriliana, L. Z. & Jaya, N. S. P. (2019). Efektivitas Penggunaan E-Tilang terhadap Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas di Polres Magelang. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 5(2), 1-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v5i2.17595
Debora, Y. (2016, 19 October). Polisi Terlibat dalam 235 Kasus Pungli. Tirto.id. Retrieved from https://tirto.id/polisi-terlibat-dalam-235-kasus-pungli-bVCo, at the date of 4 August 2020.
Fansuri, A. (2018). Sistem Tilang Elektronik terhadap Pelanggar Lalu Lintas Berdasarkan Perma Nomor 12 Tahun 2016. Ijtihad, 34(2), 195-208.
Ginting, M., et al. (2015). Standardisasi Pengelolaan Perkara Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas di Pengadilan Negeri. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 on Eradication of the Criminal Act of Corruption (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1999 Number 140, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3874).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2001 on Amendment to Law Number 31 of 1999 on Eradication of the Criminal Act of Corruption (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2001 Number 134, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4150).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2002 on the State Police of the Republic of Indonesia (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2002 Number 2, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4168).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 22 of 2009 on Road Traffic and Transportation (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2009 Number 96, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5025).
Mulyono, A. T. & Sandra, P. A. (2013). Evaluasi Kendala dan Masalah Implementasi UU 22/2009 tentang LLAJ terhadap Capaian Penyelenggaraan Jalan Nasional. Jurnal Transportasi, 13(2), 145-154.
Nuna, M., et al. (2020). Kewenangan Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara terhadap Putusan Pemberhentian Tidak dengan Hormat. University of Bengkulu Law Journal, 5(2), 106-118. doi: https://doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.5.2.106-118
Putra, R. H. W. (2020). Peran E-Tilang dalam Penindakan Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas Guna Mewujudkan Kamseltibcar Lantas di Wilayah Hukum Polres Banyumas. Police Studies Review, 4(1), 373-416.
Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 of 2016 on Procedures for Resolving Cases of Traffic Violations (Bulletin Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2016 Number 1921).
Setiyanto, S., et al. (2017). Efektivitas Penerapan Sanksi Denda E-Tilang Bagi Pelanggar Lalu Lintas Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan (Studi di Polres Rembang). Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 12(4), 742-766.
Sitepu, C., et al. (2019). Analisis Pelaksanaan E-Tilang dalam Upaya Pencegahan Praktik Pungutan Liar yang Dilakukan oleh Polisi Lalu Lintas (Studi Polres Metro Jakarta Selatan). Poenale: Jurnal Bagian Hukum Pidana, 7(2), 1-12.
Soekanto, S. (1983). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Suhariyanto, B. (2015). Penerapan Diversi untuk Menangani Problema Penyelesaian Perkara Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas di Pengadilan. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 4(1), 153-170. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.4.1.2015.153-170
Wahyuningsih, S. E. & Iksan, M. (2019). The Benefits of the E-Traffic Ticketing (E-Tilang) System in the Settlement of Traffic Violation in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies (ICILS 2019), Atlantis Press, 447-452. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icils-19.2019.22
Waluyo, B. (1991). Penelitian Hukum dalam Praktek. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Copyright (c) 2020 Jupri Jupri, Yoslan Koni, Roy Moonti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.